Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Marx Hide & Tallow Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1946No. 10060PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

The question before the District Court was one of fact. It was, whether appellee, a hide broker, purchased or sold hides of cows, steers and bulls in lots of less than 20.000 pounds. If it did, and received a commission therefor, it violated paragraph 1314.4 of Revised Price Schedule No. 9 of the Office of Price Administration, printed in the margin 1 and was liable in damages to the Administrator, in a sum three times the amount of the unlawful commission charged in each transaction. 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 925(e). The District Court found that in all instances, save…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. Winkle Terra Cotta, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Joann Matouk Romain v. City of Grosse Pointe FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Yellow Truck & Coach Mfg. Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  3. Estate of Joann Matouk Romain v. City of Grosse Pointe FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Porter Smith v. MDOCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API