Jerry Dean King v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Dissent
HEANEY, Circuit Judge,
with whom
McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting.
Because I believe King was deprived of constitutionally adequate representation by counsel’s failure to adequately investigate and present a diminished capacity defense or to present evidence of King’s mental impairments at sentencing, I respectfully dissent. In my view, this failure is justified neither by the content of Robb’s report nor by this court’s precedent regarding counsel’s duty to investigate a client’s mental functioning. I also believe King’s federal petition was fairly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Calvert L. Antwine v. Paul Delo Missouri Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.