Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jerry Dean King v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 17, 2001No. 99-2047Published

1Dissent

HEANEY, Circuit Judge,

with whom

McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting.

Because I believe King was deprived of constitutionally adequate representation by counsel’s failure to adequately investigate and present a diminished capacity defense or to present evidence of King’s mental impairments at sentencing, I respectfully dissent. In my view, this failure is justified neither by the content of Robb’s report nor by this court’s precedent regarding counsel’s duty to investigate a client’s mental functioning. I also believe King’s federal petition was fairly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Calvert L. Antwine v. Paul Delo Missouri Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API