Legal Opinion
Roxfort Holding Co. v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 21, 1959No. Civ. A. 613-55PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRILL, District Judge.
This is a Tucker Act suit, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (2), brought by a landlord to recover for use and occupation by the Government of the landlord’s premises for the period October 1-26, 1954. During that period the Government had padlocked the leased premises after levying, on the chattels of the tenant, a delinquent taxpayer. Tax liens had been duly filed. A lease was in force during the period and there was no evidence before me that the landlord had taken any steps to terminate the tenancy which expired on 31 December 1955, except as hereinafter stated.
To recover…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Minnesota Mutual Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hudson Valley Sand & Stone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Boccardo v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- Marrano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1965