Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 7, 1965No. Civ. No. 5359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, District Judge.

The above entitled cause was instituted pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1346 (a) (2), seeking to recover damages from the United States of America for the taking, use and occupancy of certain premises described in the complaint and owned by plaintiffs. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint upon the grounds that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It appears from the record in this case that prior to May, 1964, plaintiffs leased certain property in the City of Phoenix to Lichty Printing and Business Forms, Inc. for an agreed rental…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Minnesota Mutual Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Roxfort Holding Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  3. Hirsch v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LoveDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API