Legal Opinion
State, Ex Rel. v. Chillingworth
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
In this case relators seek by mandamus to require the Circuit Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida to vacate a certain order in a mandamus proceeding in the Court wherein and whereby the Circuit Judge ordered and adjudged as follows:
“This cause was duly presented by counsel for the parties upon respondent’s application filed in the Clerk’s office June Í4, 1935, and the matter was duly considered by the Court.
“The relators contend that the Act sought to be enforced by respondents is unconstitutional.
“It is the view of the Cqurt that, while the Act in question may not be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Spafford v. Brevard County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Trustees Internal Improvement Fund v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Springer v. ColburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- State Ex Rel. First Presbyterian Church v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Weathers v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Cornelius v. State Ex Rel. Tampa-West Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Frankel v. Spainhour Spainhour v. WiseheartSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.