Legal Opinion

Golden Poultry Co., Inc. v. Roper

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1995No. AV93000743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.1

Amy W. Roper filed a complaint in June 1992, alleging that she had been permanently disabled as a result of an injury she suffered in June 1991, while acting in the line and scope of her employment with Golden Poultry Company, Inc. (Golden). Golden answered, denying Roper’s allegations. Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court found that Roper had sustained a 60% loss of ability to earn. Golden filed a post-judgment motion, contending that the order failed to contain the statutory requirements regarding statements of law, facts,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Thomas v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. City of Montgomery v. KittlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API