Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 27, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1745Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLOTEAL E. BENNETT, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 18-1745 (CKK) ANDREW SAUL1, Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 27, 2019) Plaintiff Cloteal Bennett brings this action seeking review of the final administrative decision by Defendant Andrew Saul, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff's claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act.
42 U.S.C. §§401-433. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment of Reversal…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Andrew T. Wilson v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.