Legal Opinion

Slogowski v. Lyness

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1994No. 90C12373; CA A79627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the pleadings, dismissing plaintiffs negligence claim against defendant PacifiCorp. We affirm.

When we review a judgment on the pleadings, we must accept the allegations of fact in the pleadings as true. Beason v. Harcleroad, 105 Or App 376, 379-80, 805 P2d 700 (1991). The pleadings reveal the following facts.

Defendant James Lyness owns land adjacent to a roadway in Linn County. PacifiCorp holds an easement for right-of-way across that land. The easement grants

“the right to erect and maintain an electric power line, telephone or aerial cable line consisting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Donaca v. Curry CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Willamette Quarries, Inc. v. WodtliOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Taylor v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Iglehart v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Slogowski v. LynessOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API