Legal Opinion

Tobey v. Udall

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 27, 1962No. Civ. No. 61-263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge.

The petitioner is a member of the Klamath Tribe of Indians (Oregon), and is of legal majority. She is duly enrolled on the tribal list, and, as such enrollee, is entitled to receive cash benefits in an amount in excess of $40,000.-00 by reason of the sale of tribal properties, all pursuant to the terms of the *320“Klamath Indian Termination Act of August 13, 1954” (68 Stat. 718, as amended), 25 U.S.C.A. § 564 et seq.

It appears from the evidence that in anticipation of the receipt of these benefits, and upon the petitioner’s written consent, a Portland attorney-at-law was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peabody v. Town of HollandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  2. In re NorthcuttOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Sowle v. SowleNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crain v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1962
  2. Reed v. United States National Bank of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
  3. Otradovec v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API