Legal Opinion

Richard Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 30, 1985No. 920Published

1Opinion of the Court

764 F.2d 76

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,058

Richard MEYER, as custodian for Pamela Meyer, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

OPPENHEIMER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Oppenheimer Asset

Management Corporation, Oppenheimer & Co., Oppenheimer

Holdings, Inc., A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., Thomson McKinnon

Securities, Inc., Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc., J.C.

Bradford & Co., Centennial Capital Corporation, and Daily

Cash Accumulation Fund, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 920, Docket 84-7977.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued April 1, 1985.

Decided May 30, 1985.

Mordecai Rosenfeld, New York City, for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API