Legal Opinion
Billips v. Billips
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 6, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rolando T. Acosta, J.
This summary proceeding, tried before the Court on June 21, 2001, arises from petitioner husband’s claim that his wife, re*145spondent, locked him out of the apartment they shared in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 26-521. Petitioner seeks a judgment awarding and restoring him to possession of the subject premises pursuant to RPAPL 713 (10).
The proceeding requires the Court to determine whether a spouse who has been locked out of the marital apartment because of allegations of family disruption may properly avail himself of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rosenstiel v. RosenstielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Minors v. TylerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- North Waterside Redevelopment Co. v. FebbraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cipperly v. Cipperly, New York County Courts1918
- V.C. v. H.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeJesus v. RodriguezCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Soto v. SotoNassau County District Court · 2004