Legal Opinion

Cipperly v. Cipperly

New York County Courts

Decided September 15, 1918PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Summary proceeding for the purpose of' ousting defendant as a squatter on property of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, J,

This is a summary proceeding for the purpose of ousting the defendant as a squatter on the property of the plaintiff. This proceeding is brought under section 2232 of the Code of Civil Procedure and particularly under subdivision 4 of said section, which reads as follows; “ Where he, or the person to whom. *435he has succeeded, has intruded into, or squatted upon, any real property, without the permission of the person entitled to the possession thereof, and the occupancy, thus commenced, has continued without permission from the latter; or, after a permission given by him has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. . RectorNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Huber v. BletzerNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosenstiel v. RosenstielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. Halaby v. HalabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Goodwin v. GoodwinNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hall v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Marshall v. Marshall, New York County Courts1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API