Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cambridge Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1885PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff’s intestate, caused by the fall of a shed owned .by the defendant.

*481Numerous exceptions were taken at the trial, but they have all been waived in this court, except those alleged to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant.

It appeared that the defendant acquired its title by the foreclosure of a mortgage; and that, prior to the foreclosure one Pollard had occupied the premises as a tenant of the mortgagor, one Graves. One of the principal grounds of defence was, that, after the foreclosure and up…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leonard v. StorerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ahern v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Grasselli Dyestuff Corp. v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Gray v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Souza v. BeckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Schaffer v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API