Legal Opinion
Grasselli Dyestuff Corp. v. Campbell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These are three actions of tort to recover damages resulting from the freezing of water and the bursting of a hot water heater in a building. The trustees named in the second and third suits were the owners of adjoining buildings, numbered 32 and 33 India Street, in Boston. The Grasselli Dyestuff Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Grasselli Company) was a sublessee of certain parts of the building at 32 India Street including the basement., John Campbell and Company (hereinafter referred to as the Campbell Company) before October 1, 1924, was a subtenant of the second and third…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conahan v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Roberts v. Lynn Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- White v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Central Mills Co. v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- R. H. White Co. v. Remick & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Baseball Publishing Co. v. BrutonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Moss v. Grove Hall Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Willett v. PilotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Chalfen v. KraftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Gray v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.