Legal Opinion

Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of North Carolina v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 2010No. A09A1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, Occidental Fire and Casualty Company of North Carolina, Inc. challenges the denial of its motion for summary judgment. Occidental maintains that it is not subject to Georgia’s direct action statute, OCGA § 46-7-12, which allows plaintiffs to sue directly the insurers of motor carriers. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Pafford v. BiometSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Ross v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Smith v. Commercial Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mornay v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Aundray Barnes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  3. Kenneth D. Mornay, Sr v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. National Indemnity Company v. John Wayne Lariscy, IIICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API