Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 1994No. 81A01-9404-CR-114PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CGPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State of Indiana appeals from the trial court's order granting W. Burke Thomas's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the State's covert video surveillance of Thomas in a state-owned and licensed concession located on state property. The State claims that Thomas did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the concession and, thus, that the video surveillance was not an illegal warrantless search1
We affirm.2
ISSUE
We restate the issue presented for review as two questions:
1. Whether Thomas had a reasonable expectation of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nelson v. Salem State CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- United States v. Alphonso Nerber Eduardo Alvarez Alberto Betancourt Ramon Betancourt-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Haley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.