Legal Opinion

Rook v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1997No. 58A01-9609-CR-297PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, we are presented with the question of whether a police officer’s use of binoculars to view the illegal activity of a defendant in an area behind his residence constitutes an impermissible war-rantless search. Specifically, appellant-defendant Matthew N. Rook appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of marijuana seized after a police officer observed him carrying a marijuana plant in his backyard. Rook argues that the police officer’s observations constituted an unreasonable search under the United States and Indiana…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Rush v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bentz v. City of KendallvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API