Rook v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, we are presented with the question of whether a police officer’s use of binoculars to view the illegal activity of a defendant in an area behind his residence constitutes an impermissible war-rantless search. Specifically, appellant-defendant Matthew N. Rook appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of marijuana seized after a police officer observed him carrying a marijuana plant in his backyard. Rook argues that the police officer’s observations constituted an unreasonable search under the United States and Indiana…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rush v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bentz v. City of KendallvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.