Legal Opinion

Gernt v. Floyd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM FENTRESS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Fentress County. —A. H. Eoberts, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

*121This is an ejectment suit, the appeal being that of Gernt, complainant below, from a decree dismissing his bill.

The first ground assigned by the chancellor for his action was that, a deed offered by Gernt as a link in his title chain was void for lack of sufficient definiteness in the description of the property. The conveying clause of that deed sets out numerous tracts and describes the eighth tract, here involved, as follows:

“All our interest in the following described lands in the county of Fentress, State of Tennessee, to wit: . . . (8th) Entry No. 555, Grant No. 6090'.”

It is said in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beal v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Green v. Cumberland Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Alexander v. PolkMississippi Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Calton v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Campbell v. Home Ice & Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Ferguson v. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Morgan Bros. v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Jasper State Bank v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Mercy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API