Legal Opinion
Concepcion v. Lear Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 2005No. WD 64871PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Lear Corporation and its insurer, Zurich North America Insurance Company, appeal the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award of workers’ compensation to Espire Concepcion. They complain that the Second Injury Fund should be contributing to the workers’ compensation awarded to Concepcion because, contrary to the commission’s finding, his permanent disability did not result solely from an injury suffered while working for Lear.
The commission’s decision awarding Concepcion workers’ compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Karoutzos v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- E.W. v. Kansas City Missouri School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Loven v. Greene CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Roller v. Treasurer of the State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edward Gleason, St. v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of The Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lewis v. Kansas University Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- TREASURER OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ronald Lawrence v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Pursley v. Christian Hospital Northeast/NorthwestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.