Legal Opinion

Harryman v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 2017No. A159913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, P. J.

*220*326In this personal injury action, plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant Fred Meyer, Inc., challenging the trial court's granting of defendant's motion for summary judgment based on ORS 31.180, which provides that it is a defense to a personal injury action that the "person damaged was engaged in conduct at the time that would constitute *** a Class B felony." We conclude that the trial court did not err and therefore affirm.

In reviewing the trial court's ruling, we view the evidence in the record on summary judgment in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the nonmoving party, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HarrymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Johnson v. O'Malley Bros. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coast Village Prop. Owners v. Sharp Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Elifritz v. FenderDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API