Legal Opinion

Mahmoodjanloo v. Mahmoodjanloo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 2007No. 101,196Published

1Opinion of the Court

160 P.3d 951 (2007)

2007 OK 32

Tammy D. MAHMOODJANLOO, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

Behrooz MAHMOODJANLOO, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 101,196.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 15, 2007.

Floyd Taylor, Oklahoma City, OK, for Appellant.

Janice Logan Morrow of Riggs, Abney, Neal, Turpen, Orbison & Lewis, Oklahoma City, OK, for Appellee.

EDMONDSON, V.C.J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal by Behrooz Mahmoodjanloo, father and custodial parent of two daughters, from the trial court's order denying his post-decree effort to relocate with his children to New York. Father argues the trial court misapplied the statutory burden of proof…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API