Legal Opinion

Katz v. Belko

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 20, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

In the case in chief the plaintiffs, Katz and the Milton Randolph Medical Laboratory, Inc. (the corpora-*179tian), brought an action against Belko seeking damages for Seiko’s alleged failure to fulfil a guaranty provision in a written agreement dated September 27, 1974. It was claimed that the agreement was entered into between Katz as the buyer and Belko, Christian, and one Giovanniello as the sellers. However, Giovanniello denied signing the document, and the trial judge made no finding on whether it was signed by all parties. Under the terms of this alleged agreement the sellers assigned all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Merrimack Valley National Bank v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Dean S. Edmonds, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petricca Development Ltd. Partnership v. Pioneer Development Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. H&R Block Mortgage Corp. v. WhiteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001
  3. Kelley v. DolbenMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  4. Tinkham v. Jenny Craig, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API