River Corp. v. Redpath
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Commissioner.
Appellant, defendant below, was permanently enjoined by the trial court. He appeals contending the trial court should not have issued its injunction because the plaintiff’s conduct contributed to or caused the condition complained of, and second, that there is no showing in the evidence of irreparable injury. He thus raises questions relating to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the issuance of the injunction, and we review on that assumption. *141The injunction was issued under Count I which was pursuant to Rule 82.06 designated as an appealable judgment. Proceedings…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prentice v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- American Pamcor, Inc. v. KloteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Prentice v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Kirtz v. GrossmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Henson v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simcox v. ObertzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hammarstrom v. SamselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hammarstrom v. SamselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003