Legal Opinion
People v. Helmquist
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1984No. Crim. 15696PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Opinion certified for partial publication. 1 ]
Counsel Barton C. Sheela and Sheela, Rutherford & Sheela for Defendant and Appellant. John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Jay M. Bloom and Lilia E. Garcia, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
—In this search and seizure case we hold federal law now applies after the enactment of California Constitution article I, section 28, subdivision (d); United States v. Leon (1984) — U.S. — [82 L.Ed.2d 677, 104 S.Ct. 3405] is retroactive; and an alleged misstatement and omissions in the warrant affidavit do…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. MacAvoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Higgason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. BarbarickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.