Legal Opinion

Peralta v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 2011No. A11A1612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Rodolfo Jimenez Peralta, convicted by a jury of one count of kidnapping, appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that the evidence was legally insufficient and his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. Peralta contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on the kidnapping count.

That count alleged that Peralta and Nelson Delgiudice “on the 20th day of June, 2006, did then and there unlawfully abduct Alizeth Dorian Cardoza, a human being, without lawful authority and hold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Al-Amin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sellers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. Marcus Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Rodolfo Jimenez Peralta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Vernon S. Sellers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API