Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Merino

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided September 25, 2020No. 2:18-ap-01460Unknown

1Opinion

FILED & ENTERED SEP 25 2020 CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT Central District of California BY g o n z a l e z DEPUTY CLERK UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION In re: Thomas Ernesto Merino, Case No.: 2:18-bk-21250-ER Debtor. Adv. No.: 2:18-ap-01460-ER Star Rae Foreman, MEMORANDUM OF DECISION FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLED TO Plaintiff, A JUDGMENT OF NON- v. DISCHARGEABILITY Thomas Ernesto Merino, Defendant. TRIAL: Date: July 27, 2020 Time: 9:00 a.m. Location: Ctrm. 1568 Roybal Federal Building 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Nancy Shao Su in Re Louis C. Su, A/K/A Chienlu Su, Debtors. Dora Carrillo v. Louis C. SuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Ghomeshi v. SabbanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Lockerby v. SierraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Plyam v. Precision Development, LLC (In Re Plyam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API