Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 2008No. A08A2153PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Dorothy Jarvis guilty of misdemeanor obstruction of a law enforcement officer. Jarvis appeals, alleging the trial court erred in failing to grant her motion for a directed verdict of acquittal and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We find no error and affirm Jarvis’ conviction.

The standard of review for the denial of a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is the same as that for determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction: We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Taul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. MacKay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Josephine Kendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API