Legal Opinion

Baird v. Frankline

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 25, 1944No. 104, 105PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

In the opinion of a majority of the court the judgments must be affirmed. The facts are stated in Judge CLARK’S opinion and need not be here repeated.

We accede to the view that the Stock Exchange violated a duty when it failed to take disciplinary action against Richard Whitney on November 24, 1937, after there was reason to believe that the latter had converted the plaintiffs’ securities. But to justify a judgment in favor of either plaintiff, such a breach of duty must have resulted in damage that can be traced to the breach. We can see no substantial…

2Cited by109 opinions

  1. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Fratt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API