Legal Opinion

Patterson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 3, 1950No. 47775PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

This case is here upon the Government’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s petition. We therefore summarize the allegations of the petition.

The plaintiff and her husband, to whose rights she has succeeded, were in possession of certain mining claims in Madera County, California, called the Jay Gould placer claim and the Riverside quartz claim. The Gould claim was located January 1,1906, and is 660 feet wide and 1,320 feet long and comprises a portion of the bed and banks of the San Joaquin River. The Riverside quartz claim adjoins it, and is approximately 1,500 feet long and 600 feet wide. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Del-Rio Drilling Programs Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Joe Aulston and Lola Aulston v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. FreeseUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Bayshore Resources Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Last Chance Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API