Legal Opinion

Rudolph Bass, Inc. v. Thomas Industries, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff for leave to amend its bill of particulars.

No point is noted by defendants of the fact that the moving affidavit is made by plaintiff’s attorney and not by an officer of plaintiff. The opposition is grounded upon the claim that the proposed amendment gives information to the contrary of what is stated in the original bill and that the data now sought to be included are false and are interposed to defeat a pending motion by defendants for summary judgment.

It is the general policy of the courts freely to permit amendments of pleadings in advance of trial (Harriss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Thorp v. Pittsburgh Bicentennial Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Holgan Bros. v. Beekman HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Power v. Jofan Taxi Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API