Legal Opinion

United States v. Bercier

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided June 24, 2016No. : CR-13-102-RMPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1145ORDER GRANTING. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

***U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED***

ROSANNA MALOÚF PETERSON, United States District Judge

BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sentence in Light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), ECF No. 48. The Court has reviewed the motion, the response memorandum (ECF No. 53), the reply memorandum (ECF No. 54), has heard argument from counsel, and is fully informed.

BACKGROUND

On July 10, 2013, Defendant was charged with Felon in Possession of Ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. RiosDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2016
  3. United States v. SwerdonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Jayson Fulcher v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
  5. United States v. Dimitri PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API