Legal Opinion

People v. Lemons

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 2, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven M. Statsinger, J.

Defendant, charged with criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]), moves to dismiss, arguing that the information is facially insufficient. The case raises a question of first impression: Does a defendant violate a full order of protection by making a request on Instagram to follow the complainant’s Instagram page? Because the answer to this question is clearly “yes,” defendant’s motion to dismiss for facial insufficiency is denied.

I. Factual Background

A. The Allegations

According to the accusatory instrument, on May 18, 2015, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API