Legal Opinion

Aiken County v. Bodman

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 22, 2007No. Civil Action 1:05-cv-2737-RBHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.

Pending before the court is Defendants’ [Docket Entry # 19] motion to dismiss. Defendants’ motion was extensively briefed by the parties. On May 24, 2007, a hearing was held on the matter before the undersigned.

Factual Background and Procedural History

In September 2000, the United States signed the Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement with the Russian Federation in which the United States and the Russian Federation agreed to dispose of 34 metric tons each of excess weapons grade or defense plutonium. Both countries intended to achieve this goal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API