Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Palmer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 6, 2019No. 18-1365; 18-1367PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Mark Palmer and Samuel Leinicke were convicted of several conspiracy crimes, including conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substance analogues in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 813 , 841, and 846. They were sentenced to 168 and 48 months' imprisonment, respectively. They appeal the district court's 1 denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act (Analogue Act or Act) is unconstitutionally vague. In addition, Palmer asserts that the indictment failed to set forth facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. Thomas William WashamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Randeep MannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. SewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. RequenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Millard WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Wicahpe MilkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. KT BurgeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Domingo Pacheco-PooCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API