Legal Opinion

Gillis v. Bloome

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1932No. Docket No. 7945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This motion to dismiss an appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion to vacate and set aside an order granting a motion for a new trial (made after entry of a judgment of nonsuit in favor of the defendants) is made upon the ground that “the appeal attempted to be taken is from an order which is not appeal-able”.

When this motion to dismiss appeal was first made we denied it (117 Cal. App. 247 [4 Pac. (2d) 199]) on the supposed authority of Moffitt v. Ford Motor Co., 212 Cal. 73 [297 Pac. 553]. We granted a rehearing because we were convinced of error in our application of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Estate of KeaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API