Silver & Co. v. Waterman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Silver & Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term, bearing date the 19th day of December, 1907, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings, denying the plaintiffs motion to strike out certain portions of the amended supplemental answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The plaintiff sets up a cause of action against the defendants for the purpose of restraining the latter from the manufacture and sale of certain lamps claimed to be made upon a model and under labels belonging to the plaintiff. The defendants, answering the complaint, denied generally the allegations of the complaint and. then set up ■ five affirmative defenses. Subsequently the defendants moved the court at Special Term for permission to insert in each of the sepa- . rate defenses the words, “ repeat the denials to plaintiff’s complaint herein contained in paragraphs marked ‘ I…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Platt v. New York & Sea Beach Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Logeling v. New York Elevated RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Heischober v. PolishookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Goldenberg v. AdlerNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- In re Jacqueline F.New York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- In re the Estate of VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.