Legal Opinion

Canady v. Knox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1906No. 6142PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Lincoln county, Warren, J., entered December 1, 1905, in favor of tbe defendants, upon sustaining an objection to tbe introduction of testimony on tbe part of tbe plaintiff, in an action on contract

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

Appellant brought tbis action, alleging two causes of action. Tbe first is, in substance, that on June *56816, 1905, the plaintiff purchased from the defendants a butcher business in the town of Almira, said business including certain tools, machinery, ice, meat, and a lease of a certain building for a term of three years; that the plaintiff paid $3,500 as part payment of the purchase price, and also paid one month’s rent in advance, and took possession of the business; that as part of tire contract and consideration for the purchase of said business by the plaintiff, the defendants orally agreed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reichenbach v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Everett Land Co. v. ManeyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jennings v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Mead v. AntonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pettet v. WondersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Foster v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API