Jackson v. . Kearns
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Clare, O. J.
It is well settled in this State that the upper proprietor has no right to collect the water and divert it from its natural flow and discharge it upon the land of the lower proprietor. Jenkins v. R. R., 110 N. C., 443, and citations thereto in Anno. Ed. The sole question presented in this case is whether the judge properly held that the judgment for damages in a former action sustained from the diversion of water in the freshet of 1913 whereby'the plaintiff’s land and crop were injured, was an estoppel upon the plaintiffs to maintain this action for the damages resulting in 1919…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Clark v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Porter v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Barcliff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Barclift v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Lumber Co. v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Mitchell v. Town of AhoskieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Wiseman v. TOMRICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Kitchen Lumber Co. v. Tallassee Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.