Legal Opinion

Western Watersheds Project v. Kraayenbrink

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2010No. Nos. 08-35359, 08-35360PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is the federal agency charged with overseeing livestock grazing on over 160 million acres of public land in the western United States. Pursuant to the BLM’s authority under the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934, 43 U.S.C. § 315 et seq., the BLM has adopted regulations that implement its grazing management responsibilities. See 43 C.F.R. § 4100 et seq.

On July 12, 2006, the Secretary of the Interior proposed eighteen amendments to the BLM’s grazing regulations (collectively the 2006 Regulations). See 71 Fed.Reg. 39,402. The stated purpose…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Kristin Perry v. Arnold SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Gerald Jayne v. Harris ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API