Legal Opinion
Hendrix v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1922No. 8 Div. 897PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The affidavit upon which the warrant was issued is not signed by the party purporting to have made it, but under opr decisions this was not necessary. Holman v. State, 144 Ala. 95, 39 South. 646.
The defendant was charged in the affidavit with having in his possession prohibited liquors, which under the law is a misdemeanor. To this complaint he filed a plea of autrefois convict, as follows:
“Comes the defendant in the above-entitled cause and for plea says: That the state ought not to further prosecute this charge against him because of a prosecution begun by affidavit on the 27th day of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Brooke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Holman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Ex Parte BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Leigeber v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Leach v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Oldham v. Town of RogersvilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936