Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1925No. 4 Div. 982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appeliant, defendant in the court below, was charged by indictment with the offense of violating the Prohibition Law of the state, in that she unlawfully had in her possession a large quantity of prohibited liquor, some 3y2 gallons of homemade whisky.

In answer to the indictment, and as a defense thereto, she interposed a plea of former jeopardy, setting up that for this identical offense she had already been convicted in the mayor’s court of the city of Eufaula, Ala., on the 3d day of April, 1924.

The state demurred to the plea of “autrefois convict,” and, among other grounds, insisted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Ex Parte BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Leigeber v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Hendrix v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Schroeder v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Marchman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API