Legal Opinion
Roemen v. United States of America
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 16, 2023No. 4:19-cv-04006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICAH ROEMEN; 4:19-CV-04006-LLP TOM TEN EYCK, Guardian of Morgan Ten Eyck; and MICHELLE TEN EYCK, Guardian of Morgan Ten Eyck, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION Plaintiffs, OF DOCUMENTS vs. DOCKET NO. 170 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROBERT NEUENFELDT, individually And UNKNOWN SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OF THE UNITED STATES, individually, Defendants. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the Second Amended Complaint of plaintiffs Micah Roemen, and Tom and Michelle Ten Eyck, as guardians of Morgan Ten…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Thompson v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hiawatha Nash v. Lee Roy Black, David Blackwell, Dale Riley, Gerald T. Frey, Donna Kay Brown and Mike CurranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.