Charles Bland, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
I
OVERVIEW
The Director of the California Department of Corrections and the Attorney General of the State of California (collectively referred to as the “State”) appeal the district court’s grant of Charles Bland’s (Bland) habeas petition; 1 The district court concluded that the state trial court denied Bland his Sixth Amendment right to obtain counsel of his choice. We affirm.
II
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 4, 1987, three men in . a blue and white Suzuki Jeep drove past a group of people standing at a bus stop in Inglewood, California. The men in the jeep…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- LaGrand v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.