Arthur Meister and Dorothy Meister v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The primary question presented is whether the Tax Court erred in rejecting the appellant-taxpayers’ contention that critical documentary evidence in the instant civil tax proceeding was inadmissible because it was obtained in violation of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights in that it had been wrongfully taken from them by their bookkeeper and later allegedly illegally “seized” by the Government in a search of the then deceased bookkeeper’s home where they were found.
A second question presented is whether the Tax Court erred in admitting into…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. William Fred PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Frank RaganoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- State v. BidegainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.