Legal Opinion
Solow v. Liebman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendant from committing a nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated May 27, 1991, which, inter alia, denied his motion (1) to add the Incorporated Village of East Hampton as a defendant to this action, and (2) for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to the mandate of CPLR 9802, the plaintiff was required to serve a notice of claim upon the Village of East Hampton in compliance with General…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Crosta v. A. Reynolds Construction & Supply Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Nassau County v. Incorporated Village of RoslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Solow v. LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Waterside Associates v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greco v. Incorporated Village of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of Brookhaven v. MasciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kaufman v. Village of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Solow v. Incorporated Village of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001