Georges v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge. 1
At this time the Court has the obligation to rule upon the defendant's motion made yesterday upon the close of the plaintiffs’ testimony. While the motion reads in the language of a motion for directed verdict, the Court will treat it the same as a motion for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41, subd. (b), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. 2
It is basic that in consideration of this motion the Court must assume all of the evidence submitted in plaintiffs’ case to be true and view it in its entirety in a light most favorable to the plaintiffs’ contentions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Voyt v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Harold L. Ward v. Union Bond & Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Normile v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by24 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- McClure Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Robinson Insurance & Real Estate Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.