Legal Opinion

United States v. Clements

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1979No. 77-5492PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Circuit Judge:

This is a gambling case in which the bulk of the Government’s evidence was obtained through telephone wiretaps. Defendants challenge their convictions on four major grounds: first, they attack the court order permitting the telephone taps, arguing that, the supporting affidavit was deficient for a number of reasons; second, they assert the Government has failed to prove a violation of the federal gambling statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1955, in that there was neither (1) a violation of state law, (2) the requisite five persons in the business, nor (3) the required financial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. Harold McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Phillip Onori and Theodore BukkyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. John Russell Webster, Jr., Delbert Paul Hoskins, Robert Bode and John Jay CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. United States v. DedmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. GorelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API