Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Anderson v. Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion for a peremptory mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Green, J.

This is an application for a peremptory mandamus to compel the township hoard of La Grange, to draw their order in favor of the relator, upon the township treasurer, for the sum of $350, damages apjnaised to him upon the laying out and establishing a highway upon his lands, with the interest thereon.

Upon filing the affidavit of the relator, a rule was made at a previous term of this Court, that the respondents show causo; and the respondents, pursuant to such order, have filed a statement of their objections to the issuing of the writ, supported by affidavits.

The facts, so far as it is…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Harrison v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. In Re Petition of State Highway Com'r.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Township of Marathon v. Township of OregonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API