People ex rel. Anderson v. Township Board
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion for a peremptory mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Green, J.
This is an application for a peremptory mandamus to compel the township hoard of La Grange, to draw their order in favor of the relator, upon the township treasurer, for the sum of $350, damages apjnaised to him upon the laying out and establishing a highway upon his lands, with the interest thereon.
Upon filing the affidavit of the relator, a rule was made at a previous term of this Court, that the respondents show causo; and the respondents, pursuant to such order, have filed a statement of their objections to the issuing of the writ, supported by affidavits.
The facts, so far as it is…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Campau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Harrison v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- In Re Petition of State Highway Com'r.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Township of Marathon v. Township of OregonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.