Legal Opinion
Day v. Hyman
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided May 9, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, P.J.
Following a bench trial, the judge found that defendant Scott Hyman, d/b/a XXX-treme Cycles (“Hyman”), breached his motorcycle sales contract with plaintiff Peter B. Day (“Day”) and violated the Consumer Protection Act, G.L.c. 93A. Hyman claims on this appeal that the judge erred in finding that Hyman had revoked his offer to sell the motorcycle to Day and, even if Hyman had breached the contract, that such breach constituted a violation of G.L.c. 93A. We find no error, and affirm the judgment.
The trial court found the following. On March 8, 2004, Day agreed to buy from Hyman’s shop in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Business Incentives, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Buster v. George W. Moore, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Janney Montgomery Scott LLC v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Nisby v. SheskeyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007