Legal Opinion

Orth v. Transit Inv. Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1942No. 8084PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Facts

On March 7, 1940, the plaintiff, a preferred stockholder of Transit Investment Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, filed suit on behalf of himself and the other stockholders of Transit Investment Corporation against that company, against Pennsylvania Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and against certain individuals who were or are officers and directors of Transit Investment Corporation. An amended complaint was filed and to this the defendants filed an answer.

The amended complaint alleges that the officers and directors of Transit Investment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Skirvin v. MestaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Mintzer v. Arthur L. Wright & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fiscal Fund, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  5. Peter Demet v. Allen B. Harralson, Trustee in Bankruptcy in the Matter of Sky Bowl, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API